Building The Autonomous Nonprofit Board

Building The Autonomous Nonprofit Board

By Eugene Fram

I recently came upon a current article about building an autonomous business board. * Some of the suggestions in the article, I think, can be applied to NFP boards. The overall viewpoint in the article is summarized as follows, but it is modified to be useful for NFP boards:

Simply adopting the right policies and complying with the rules can no longer achieve good nonprofit governance. As increased scrutiny of the board’s mission imperatives (for example, via IRS 990 Forms) intensifies, both directors and management must be willing to respect the boundaries that define their exclusive roles while working together to ensure that their actions support the goals of the nonprofit and its various stakeholders.

To help determine whether or not a nonprofit board can be classified an autonomous, the following questions must be considered.

What are the roles of the CEO and senior management in NFP governance? Are these roles reasonably clarified? NFP boards or individual directors can easily default to micromanagement. There needs to be a process for senior management to easily call the attention to the for board corrective actions. Also, what are the board and staff responsibilities for fundraising? Both must work together effectively to meet financial goals.

How does the work of the board and its committees actually get done? NFPs can have a proliferation of committees on the mistaken premise that the greater director board involvement leads to better director engagement. Only meaningful engagement achieves true involvement. Three to five board standing committees should be sufficient. Have ad hoc committees or task forces, composed of staff and directors; then study major policy changes or assess major opportunities.

What mechanism does the board does the board use to oversee management, assess business risks and monitor the nonprofit’s performance? The board must develop evaluation mechanisms that are fair and robust. The CEO needs to be involved with the development of these mechanisms. A board audit committee must be actively involved during the year between annual evaluations of the CEO and organizational impacts. Qualitative outcomes, more important for nonprofits than for business organizations, must be considered and fairly evaluated. (See: http://bit.ly/OvF4ri)

How proactive is the board in challenging management and shaping the nonprofit’s strategic direction? Many nonprofit directors are at a disadvantage because they are not intimately acquainted with the field in which the nonprofit operates. Consequently, when presented with strategic decisions, directors must be ready to “drill down” on the issues involved, even if their questions appear to be naive.

What is the right balance between transparency and confidentiality in the boardroom? For-profits and NFP are being asked to be more transparent. Financial information must become current and readily available to the public. However, with some personnel information and non-material internal concerns, confidentiality is needed. A constant issue facing boards is how the latter category of information, if made public, will impact the operations of the nonprofit? For example, at what point, should a NFP board announce the resignation of a short tenured CEO? Such a rapid change might raise questions about the organization’s viability?

How effective is the NFP board as a resource and support for management? The NFP board topically represents a community, profession or an industry. Consequently, the board needs to continually provide management information related to client concerns and opportunities. In addition, the board has an obligation to develop financial support for the nonprofit. However, the CEO still has a responsibility to have state-of-art knowledge about the field to support those directors whose occupations are adjunct to the mission the nonprofit.

Thoughtful nonprofit boards are always looking to improve how they operate. Applying the above questions and comments to a specific board situation can open a discussion to move a legacy board to become a 21st century autonomous one.

*John C. Wilcox, (2013) “The Autonomous Board,” Sod’ali Aligning Interests, October.

For more details on the above comments see:
Blog-site: http://bit.ly/yfRZpz Book: http://amzn.to/eu7nQl

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s