nonprofit boards

Gold Standards for a Strategic Mission Focused Nonprofit

Gold Standards for a Strategic Mission Focused Nonprofit
By Eugene Fram

The following is Google’s mission statement:

To organize the world’s information and make it universally assessable and useful.

This twelve-word expression of purpose should serve as a shining example to nonprofit boards that wrestle with the development of their own mission statements. Typically the process takes huge amounts of time as boards struggle to accommodate a wide range of viewpoints.* Too often the resulting statements tend to be complex and hard to understand.

Here are some approaches that are of fundamental importance to building strategic strength in a mission-focused nonprofit: (more…)

McNamara/Fram Discussion on Nonprofit Bylaw Changes

NcNamara
I disagree with you a bit 🙂

Fram
Carter: Thanks for your comments below. I really appreciate your comments, as they force me to rethink and reconsider my viewpoints.

My replies are in bold

McNamara
You and I have been around the nonprofit world for a long time. We’ve seen where lawyers did Board trainings in the ’70s and early ’80s. Everything back then was determined by what was in your bylaws. If you wanted to change how the organization operated, then a change in bylaws was supposed to accomplish that 🙂 (more…)

Should The CEO Lead or Follow the Board in Development? Updated & Reissued

Should The CEO Lead or Follow the Board in Development?
By Eugene Fram

The CEO is the advance guard when it comes to fund-raising. First and foremost, he/she has to be alert to all places where the CEO can raise funds on his/her own initiative. (more…)

What Nonprofit CEOs Think of Their Boards – Some Projections

What Nonprofit CEOs Think of Their Boards – Some Projections

By Eugene Fram

Governance articles frequently cover issues related to relationships between the CEO and board. A comprehensive report was recently published in a recent Harvard Business Review* citing what for-profit CEOs readily think of their boards. Following is a projection of how some of the article’s conclusions can apply to nonprofit CEO’s thinking, based on my decades of experience with nonprofit boards.

• “[T]he best leadership partnerships are forged where there is mutual respect (between CEO & board), energetic commitment to the future success of the enterprise and strong bonds of trust. … Great boards support entrepreneurial risk taking with prudent oversight, wise counsel and encouragement.”

These statements should be the gold standards for nonprofit CEO- board relationships. Unfortunately, not many nonprofits have the gold standard or even reach for it. Too many nonprofit boards, because of long traditions, see the CEO-board relationship as a “parent–child” one. This leads to mistrust, board focus on operations and missed strategic opportunities for growth. Many nonprofit boards are very careful with risk related decisions, but the gold standard does allow nonprofit boards to assume reasonable risks. (more…)

Program Reductions Are Mandated—What Can A Nonprofit Do?

Program Reductions Are Mandated—What Can A Nonprofit Do?

The word from management is that the board of directors has decreed there will be program cuts. Regardless of the rationale, be it financial or mission-related, the proposed loss is a source of concern to directors and is a common nonprofit board challenge in the 21st century.
Reactions are varied and I invite you to share your board experience on the topic; here are some deliberations that I have encountered in the past: (more…)

Retaining Excellent Nonprofit Board Members by Keeping Them Meaningfully Involved – Part II

Retaining Excellent Nonprofit Board Members by Keeping Them Meaningfully Involved – Part II

By: Eugene Fram

Board members will stay interested and involved in their nonprofit organizations if they are convinced that their activities have a purpose and serve the organization. This is what I call meaningful involvement. And as a side note, being pertinent and time-limited is especially applicable for younger individuals building a career, only because this group is now used to immediate gratification and to projects that last no longer than the equivalent of a semester. When board members feel their involvement is meaningful, they will often remark, “Assignments are interesting and well organized.”

Following are some hypothetical examples: of meaningful involvement: (more…)

Who is Primarily Accountable for Long Term Planning – Board or CEO?

Who is Primarily Accountable for Long Term Planning – Board or CEO?

By: Eugene Fram

THE QUESTION

 Can you further clarify whom you see as accountable for making what decisions in relation to the various aspects of corporate strategy creation and execution? If the board approves the CEO’s decisions do they not become board decisions? Where is the scope for the CEO to be accountable for making his or her own decisions?

MY ANSWER
“(My model)… promotes accountability. It requires the board and the CEO to work together to paint the big picture for the organization. It then holds the CEO accountable for implementing that vision. The (board’s) planning and resource committee (also) plays a major part in painting this picture by helping the organization and the CEO to look ahead to look to the future.” <!–more–>

Now for some details also found in “Policy vs. Paper Clips. *  (http://amzn.to/eu7nQl)

The CEO is asked, in addition to heading operations, to be looking ahead in the organization’s mission focused field. This is very important where the board is largely an eclectic group of volunteers. The CEO should be thinking about these issues 24/7 and bringing what S/he considers the important ones to the board’s planning and resource committee, from which the board has a process for selecting those that have potential for further study by a board-staff ad hoc committee or task force. Where the board is composed of field professionals, like the Associated Press, the CEO still has an obligation to be on the frontiers of field changes and opportunities, obviously very important to the AP.

* Board members from all backgrounds have an obligation to bring GENERATIVE, out-of-the-box, thinking to the board. Where this often falls short with nonprofit boards is that many attempt to acculturate directors to the culture of the organization, instead of being open to the person’s expertise and culture. For example, if a director has expertise in financial planning, nonprofits often will ask the director to be involved with immediate accounting issues, instead of expanding the organization’s financial outlook.

Many of these field insights are covered in my blog site, now numbering a selection of over 100 current blogs. http://bit.ly/yfRZpz

See previous blog:  Differences: Nonprofit Board Board Policy/Strategy Development vs. Management Operations

*PS: Recent Comment on the Model

Our Board applied the principles in Policy Vs. Paper Clips after the first edition came out many years ago. We were fortunate to have the author himself consult with us. I can unequivocally state that the Corporate model spelled out in this book works and is responsible for the incredible growth and success my not for profit has experienced over the last 15 years. More importantly the Board members love it because they are engaged at a strategic level that allows them to use their brains and contribute in a meaningful way. Every not for profit CEO and Board member should read this book regardless of size or scope of the organization. Its how Boards need to work in the 21st century.

Difference: Nonprofit Board Policy/Strategy Development vs. Managing Operations

Difference: Nonprofit Board Policy/Strategy Development vs. Managing Operations

By: Eugene Fram

Following is how I view the difference between the nonprofit board functions versus operations management functions. Based upon my governance model (see bottom of page), all of the responsibilities listed below are board functions. <!–more–>

A. DIRECTS MANAGEMENT
1. Establishes, in partnership with management, long-term organizational objectives
2. Sets overall policies affecting strategies designed to achieve objectives.
3. Employs the CEO.

B. JUDGES MANAGEMENT ACTIONS
1. Evaluates short-term and long-term management performance.
2. Determines whether policies/strategies are being carried out and goals achieved.

C. APPROVES MANAGEMENT ACTIONS
1. Critically reviews, approves, or disapproves proposals in policy areas (for example, major capital needs or expenditures and major contacts)
2. Provides formal recognition and acceptance of executive decisions when related to operational concerns.

D. ADVISES MANAGEMENT
1.Acts in an advisory consultative capacity, when sought by management.

E. RECEIVES INFORMATION FROM MANAGEMENT
1. Regularly receives reports on the organization (e.g., performance, program development, external factors, other challenges or concerns).

F. ACTS AS A PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS RESOURCE FOR MANAGEMENT.
1. Keeps the organization attuned to the external environment in which it operates.

G. FUNDRAISING PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN BOARD & CEO

1. CEO & staff act as “scouts” for fundraising opportunities.  Board members act as the “cavalry” to team with management,  to make generative proposals, to make formal proposals and to make needed interpersonal contacts.

For more detail on how this fits into my policy/strategy model, see: “Policy vs. Paper Clips,” Third Edition, (2011). Available on

Amazon.com: http://amzn.to/eu7nQl

My blog site: http://bit.ly/yfRZpz

A 21st Century Nonprofit Reality – The Chief Executive Needs to be a President/CEO

A 21st Century Nonprofit Reality – The Chief Executive Needs to be a President/CEO

By: Eugene Fram

Many of my viewers* know that I strongly favor nonprofit boards, which develop a budget level of more than $1 million (US) and employ about 10 full and part time people, should designate their chief executive as the President/CEO. A volunteer director then becomes the board chair. Below, in italics, is a response I received to my viewpoint listed on the Board Source blog site:

Interesting points. However, where I come from, executive director is the recognized title for the heads of non-profits, with the possible exception of multimillion-dollar agencies. Everyone understands it. Even when the ED is recognized (in bylaws and/or policies) as the CEO of the agency, they still tend to use the ED title, The CEO title smacks of the for profit sector, which may be off-putting to the social service sector, perhaps a tinge of “playing out of your league.” President is definitely from the for profit sector, and could be confusing from the perspective that some boards still refer to their chairs as “presidents. (more…)

Custom Designing A New Nonprofit’s Chief Executive Orientation

Custom Designing A New Nonprofit’s Chief Executive Orientation

By: Eugene Fram

Under a customized format, the nonprofit board tailors a program that helps the new executive develop a solid base in the organization and understand its unique climate and culture. Properly structured, this orientation takes about a year to complete. (more…)